Bombshell Claim: Obama Secretly Worked Against Harris After Biden’s Exit

NBC Reporter Drops Bombshell About Obama’s Alleged Opposition to Harris

In a shocking revelation that has sent ripples through political circles, NBC News senior reporter Jonathan Allen claims that former President Barack Obama was working behind the scenes against Kamala Harris following President Biden’s withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race.

The explosive allegation came during Allen’s April 1 appearance on MSNBC, where he stated that Obama privately pushed for an open primary rather than automatically backing Harris as the Democratic nominee. This behind-the-scenes maneuvering reportedly occurred despite Obama’s public endorsement and campaign appearances for Harris.

The Surprising Claims About Obama’s True Position

According to Allen’s sources close to the former president, Obama had significant reservations about Harris’s chances of electoral success. “President Obama absolutely did not think that Joe Biden should continue, according to our sources,” Allen revealed during the interview.

In perhaps the most damaging claim, Allen added: “And he also didn’t want Kamala Harris to be the replacement for Biden. He didn’t think that she was the best choice for Democrats, and he worked really behind the scenes for a long time to try to have a mini-primary or an open convention.”

The reporter didn’t mince words when characterizing Obama’s alleged actions, stating bluntly that the former president “was really working against her” while harboring serious doubts about “her ability to win the election.”

The Public vs. Private Obama

What makes these allegations particularly striking is the contrast between Obama’s supposed private maneuvering and his public support for Harris. After Biden’s withdrawal, Obama publicly endorsed Harris and appeared at multiple high-profile campaign events to rally support for her candidacy.

This apparent contradiction raises questions about political loyalty and strategy within the Democratic Party’s highest circles. If true, it suggests a significant disconnect between the party’s public unity and private doubts during a critical election cycle.

Political analysts have long speculated about tensions within the Democratic leadership, but Allen’s claims represent one of the most direct accusations of behind-the-scenes opposition from a former president toward his party’s eventual nominee.

The Timeline of Democratic Party Turmoil

The drama began when President Biden made the unprecedented decision to withdraw from seeking a second term, creating a momentous shift in Democratic Party strategy. Harris quickly consolidated support to become the nominee, though Allen’s reporting suggests that consolidation may have faced significant behind-the-scenes resistance.

“He did not have faith in her ability to win the election. As it turned out, she didn’t win,” Allen stated, connecting Obama’s alleged concerns with the eventual election outcome that saw Donald Trump return to the presidency after defeating Harris in both the electoral college and popular vote.

Unanswered Questions and Potential Fallout

Allen’s bombshell claims raise several important questions. Why would Obama publicly campaign for Harris while privately working against her? Who were the alternative candidates Obama might have preferred? And perhaps most importantly, how might the Democratic Party’s 2024 prospects have differed if an open primary had occurred?

Neither Obama nor Harris have publicly responded to Allen’s allegations at the time of publication. Representatives for the former president have previously maintained that Obama was fully supportive of Harris’s candidacy throughout the campaign.

The timing of Allen’s revelation—coming after the election has concluded—also raises questions about journalistic practices and when such significant information should be shared with the public. Critics might question whether voters deserved to know about these alleged divisions before casting their ballots.

As the Democratic Party begins the process of rebuilding and strategizing for future elections, these allegations may influence internal party dynamics and trust between various factions of Democratic leadership.

Whether Allen’s claims will be corroborated by other sources or disputed by Obama’s team remains to be seen, but they’ve already added another layer to the complex post-mortem analysis of a historic and consequential presidential election.